Thursday, 24 July 2014

The Long and Triumphant March of Jewish Gibberish

 .


Our societies have swallowed every big lie that 'democratic' governments have foisted upon us over recent years. No matter how ridiculous or provably false, the lie is established as fact by media spokespersons and the process of mere repetition.

At the moment the ongoing slaughter in Gaza is defended and maintained primarily by the lie of 'equivalence'.

The Big Lie of 'Equivalence'

This lie is repeated endlessly on all mainstream media by newscasters, so-called 'journalists' (and the 0.5% of our population whose arguments get well in excess of 50% of broadcast airtime). We have two sides 'at war' and Israel has a right, indeed a duty, to "protect its innocent civilians" from Hamas' rockets. 

There are two problems with this narrative.

1) Israel started this war. The pretext was created when 3 young Jewish hitchhikers were kidnapped and murdered about three weeks ago. There is zero evidence that this crime was committed by Hamas or even Palestinians. Hamas (who normally, in the manner of all such groups [like the IRA used to] claim credit for their attacks) denied that this event had anything to do with them. It was reported in Haaretz that the head of the IDF had predicted, one week before the event, the kidnapping of 3 young Israelis. Seasoned observers of the Israeli machine, like Gilad Atzmon, predicted that something dreadful was about to happen.

It appears a strange thing that criminal governments always seem to feel the need to publicly advertise their crimes in advance but this appears to be a necessary element in what is, essentially, an occult and Satanic template. Michael Hoffman has written brilliantly about this. He calls this phenomenon 'The Revelation of the Method'. It appears that within occult ideology pre-relating your crime or abuse transfers guilt to the victim and deepens the sense of powerlessness and loss. It amplifies the effects of the evil (as in phoning someone up and telling him that you are going to come round and rape his wife before actually doing it).

Similar signals were publicly broadcast before the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks. 

Bearing all this in mind it is clear that this is a war of Israel's choosing. Another 'mowing of the lawn' and perhaps more.

2) Stating the obvious yet again, it should be remembered that the "innocent Israeli civilians" that need protecting are not 'Semites' but pale-skinned ethnic Khazars from Russia, Brooklyn and Stamford Hill with zero historical connection to the land of Palestine......... .........individuals who think they have the right to march into someone else's country, steal their land, lock the dispossessed up in an open prison, starve them, pollute their water supplies, deny them even the ability to trade, repeatedly massacre them, then act the innocent victim when the imprisoned fling mostly harmless missiles over the prison fence in their direction.
  
The fact that the Israeli population almost unanimously supports their government in the mass-murder of women and children is, to the onlooker, one of the most distressing aspects of this 'conflict'.

But are these "civilians", these thieves who demand Palestinian blood, really innocent. Have Hamas not some justification in considering all Israelis who inflict these gross injustices against their people as war criminals, thieves and murderers.

Is there really 'equivalence' of any conceivable kind between the two sides in this conflict.

For most of us, whatever our political representatives say on our behalf, the question answers itself.

But the fact there is gross injustice and unacceptable abuse of the defenseless going on in Gaza is not obvious to Melanie Phillips and her ilk.


Given the violations of International Law, the child-murdering carnage and the decades of Israeli bad faith, is it not staggering that 100% of the US Senate voted in support of Israel's attacks on Gaza? Is it not also staggering that 82% of Conservative MP's are 'Friends of Israel'? 

How, in God's name, did we ever get to where we are?

THE LONG AND TRIUMPHANT MARCH OF JEWISH GIBBERISH

The problem is this.

The entire western world has succumbed to the power of Jewish money, first....and the Jewish gibberish that goes with it, second. 

The second element in our corruption is more significant than the first. Money is not harmful in itself, however lies are very harmful indeed. Without them evil is exposed, naked and disgusting for exactly what it is. Evil must clothe itself in lies in the same manner that Satan must approach the well-intentioned soul as Lucifer, angel of light, imitator of God. 

To co-operate with evil we must be made to see it as good.

Without lies evil is all but a corpse.

The war to establish the hegemony of Jewish gibberish has been going on for a very long time. The record of this war, its plans, templates and increasing sophistication exist for all to read in a long and clearly unfolding lineage; The Book of Deuteronomy, The Talmud, The Protocols of Zion, The Communist Manifesto and the most devastating final variation on a racist supremacist theme, the works of the Frankfurt School of Psychology are easily accessible to anyone who cares to look.

According to the four Gospels, condemnation of the earliest versions of these teachings was a major part of Christ's mission on earth. He accused the Pharisees (and their scribes and lawyers) of being "of Satan"

....Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. (John 8:44)

What Christian reminds us of this teaching today? What Christian Church is prepared to even recognise the importance of this central warning that Christ's delivered to the world? The part that, after all, got Him executed.

In an age when  Catholic Popes are prepared to participate in joint religious ceremonies with leaders of the cult whose holy book, The Talmud, says,


one is forced to conclude that the Pharisees have now ABSORBED the Christian Churches. 

In other words, that in the manner that the rest of society has been drawn into the Jewish religion via 'secular', Frankfurt-School-style political correctness and all the liberality and 'tolerance' that go with it, so too have the major christian Churches.

i.e. All elements of the establishment of our entire society are Talmudists, whether they recognise it or not.

If Christ returned today he would address the leaders of Christian churches exactly as he did the Pharisees two thousand years ago.

Another way of putting it......

....in a nutshell....is to say

We are all Jews now.

Inasmuch as we believe the lies placed before us, inasmuch as we passively observe the evident crimes committed in our names, inasmuch as the Jewish gibberish lives in our minds and hearts we are souls in need of real liberation.

Being ethnically Jewish, Sephardic or Ashkenazi, is not the problem.

Being enslaved by lies is the problem. 

Many ethnic Jews are among the most vocal and powerful prophets of our day regarding the cultural and spiritual disaster that is ever more enfolding and enslaving us.


We must not blame persons of Jewish descent. They must be saved, like the rest of us. Jews have generally been more intensively brainwashed than ourselves......but while their brainwashing regarding the world is much the same as our own they also have to cope with additional burdens. They have been told that all non-Jews irrationally hate them. They also have to cope with the fact that males endure a bout of pre-cognitive genital mutilation, embedding in their subconscious minds a nameless knowing that somebody, somewhere really is out to get them.

I'm not ethnically Jewish myself but I realise more and more that I have been a Jew most of my life....before the beginnings of truth dawned (via the recognition of the BIG lies, 9/11 etc). At a certain moment the spell of these lies that had been cast over me was broken. This process is irreversible but our egoic nature makes the first step difficult, it being uncomfortable to admit the extent of one's own gullibility.

I renounce my Jewishness here and now and call on all Jews, bound to Talmudic lies to do the same. (The truth is that we gentiles are human too. We are. Really. Even though I say so myself. Neither do we hate you. It is a natural human thing to hate lies and wickedness but do not confuse this with an a priori, necessary prejudice against Jews as people.) 
I renounce my Pharasaical Catholic Church that has nothing whatsoever to say about the greatest lies of our times, nor will acknowledge some of the most important teachings of the Messiah it purports to follow.


I understand that there will only be one winner in the ongoing war of the Spirit. I obscurely perceive that the Creator's system is greater than I can possibly realise and that even those that oppose the True God and True Creator cannot help but work towards the greater good* of all beings in the long run. 



*For example, although overtly 'racist' Deuteronomy, the Talmud etc. are, much more essentially, simply Satanic than 'racist'. The 'racism' is simply there to enslave a target group (who, in keeping with all the other gibberish, are not really a race at all).

In the effort to establish the desired global Satanic tyranny it has been necessary to undermine tribal, cultural, racial, national, familial and religious unities of peoples by promoting (among other things) 'anti-racism' in order that mass-immigration can be imposed on 'the nations' with minimal resistance. 

This 'anti-racism' has largely served its purpose. There is much less 'nationalism' and 'racism' amongst the broad masses of the public than there used to be a few decades ago.....and a good thing too.

Though the motive is all wrong, the outcome is potentially positive inasmuch as people have learned to see the other as being essentially no different from themselves. Thus Lucifer cannot help but serve God, whatever its intention. Or, as Les Visible put it.
'Lucifer works for God'.

In the end we all do.

The sooner we Jewish people collectively recognise this the better for everybody.



In the meantime God help Gaza.


.











Thursday, 17 July 2014

AN IDEA

.


Following the killing of four Gazan children by an Israeli shell whilst they were playing football on a beach (reported by the BBC here), condemnations of the Israeli government on radio phone-ins (in London, certainly) has reached a new pitch of intensity.

Of course all media outlets are committed to 'balance'. so every criticism is matched with a Jewish contributor ranting, often hysterically, about the unfair criticism to which Israel has been subjected over the past days. Israel called a ceasefire and HAMAS BROKE IT!!! etc...... 

Such supporters of Israel (that includes, it would appear, a very large majority of Jews) do not understand why Hamas should not recognise an Israeli-announced "ceasefire" which is clearly nothing more than a PR exercise. A ceasefire that, ridiculously, Hamas were not involved in brokering.

Jews should understand that Hamas is not sending rockets into Israel just so that Israel will stop bombing Gaza. Hamas also demands some measure of decent treatment for its people.......such as that Gazans be allowed more than starvation-level food rations, that their border be opened, that they be allowed to trade etc., etc.

For the noisy, hysterical, phone-in Sayanim in the west it appears that what anything means for Gazans is, at best, irrelevant.

Here is a people who can steal a country, lock up the dispossessed in an open-air prison and slaughter them like rats in a bucket and then cry out in agony to the world as if they themselves are the victims in this situation.

As the Polish proverb says:
                                         "The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you."
Perhaps this should be modernised to:
                                          "The Jew cries out in pain as he bombs you."

Most people associate this appalling and pitiful level of lack of empathy with the autistic or psychopathic personality.

How can we help Jews who support the persecution of Gazans to see the reality of the situation as most of the rest of us do?

Here is an idea.

There exist large northern towns densely infested by some of the ugliest Council estates imaginable.

Why don't we:

Fill one such large estate with Jewish residents who have been expelled from their desirable homes in Stamford Hill and Golders Green.
Hand over these homes to the erstwhile residents of the Council houses.
Enclose the Jews-only estate with a fence that cannot be breached.
Bomb them occasionally.
Only allow enough food into the estate to barely keep them alive. 
Destroy most of their supplies of clean water.
Forbid them from trading with anyone outside their estate.
Call anyone they elect to representative them terrorists.

If they get hold of cheap weaponry (as they one day probably will) and take to firing it randomly into the territory of their jailers, we slaughter a few thousand of them and fill the airwaves with the voices of local English people whining about how intolerable their lives have been made by said terrorists.

If we do all this for a few decades, will resident Jewish lobbies eventually see Gaza as we see it?

Don't bet on it.


.



Wednesday, 16 July 2014

Too Many Who In The BBC?

.


So, Lord Hall is "pledging to recruit greater numbers of black and minority ethnic employees at the BBC."

It is astonishing how the brainwashed droves of the politically correct (whether they be white or black [or Jewish]*) happily embrace their own suicidal delusions and hold them as evidence of their own superior intelligence rather than as evidence of their susceptibility to carefully crafted Jewish mind-control.


The unsayable thing, the taboo that must be breached, is this:

There is a very real and active racism at work inside the BBC. 


Jewish racism.

Jews are massively over-represented in the BBC, as they are in the UK parliament. 

Lord Hall's policy initiative will not cause Jews (0.5% of the UK population) to be driven from their position of dominance. Quite the opposite.

Quotas will drive indigenous whites from the organisation. Jewish domination will be sustained and the theft of the UK from the native population will accelerate.

This whole 'anti-racism' as cultural destruction' idea was invented by Frankfurt School Jewish thinkers during the middle decades of the 20th century.

We, the indigenous white population, are under attack. The war against the white European male goes hand-in-hand with the Jewish war against God.


If you don't realise this read Deuteronomy, The Talmud, the Protocols of Zion, the Communist Manifesto or the works of the Frankfurt School of Psychology. 

The message of each is the same. The aim the same; global governance under a single financial/spiritual Jewish leadership.

When we read the kind of thing that the Jewish God demands of his tribe we have good reason to feel worried....to put it mildly.

Deuteronomy 15:6 “For the LORD thy God blesseth thee, as he promised thee: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over thee.”
Deuteronomy 7:16, 20:16 “And thou shalt consume all the peoples which the Lord thy God shall deliver unto thee; thine eye shall not pity them…thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth.”

*Surely no sensible Jew who really understands what the Orthodox Rabbinate have done to his/her mind can feel happy about where the world is being led by this coven of international fraudsters. Surely the ordinary Jew must understand that this is all likely to end in tears (to put it very mildly) for his own people as surely as it will be terrible for the rest of us.
.

Sunday, 22 June 2014

THERE IS NO OTHER WICKED RELIGION LIKE ISLAM

.

On BBC Radio 4's "Moral Maze" yesterday Melanie Phillips, Well-known Jewish columnist, commentator, anti-Islamicist and all-round warmonger said the following about Islam (at 39:00 on this link):

"There is no other religion that preaches a dislike of people who are not of that religion and a desire to take them over."

Absolutely breathtaking. 

The Book of Deuteronomy is a template for the Jewish destruction of other nations. Jews are instructed to enslave by usury ("You will lend and will not borrow").  Deuteronomy means "Second Law". It was the work of the Levite priests and their scribes. Together they refashioned much of the OT as a declaration of war against the rest of the world. It was the inheritors and propagators of these teachings (the scribes and Pharisees) that Christ condemned. (This issue is dealt with in much detail in Douglas Reed's great work, "The Controversy of Zion").

In the Old Testament, time and time again the Jewish God demanded the absolute destruction of Israel's enemies. e.g From Samuel 1: 

".....Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys....."

In the Talmud things get worse. God is sidelined and the Rabbis get down to the detail of how the destruction of 'The Goyim' (that's us, folks) is to be enacted in fine detail. 

Finding evidence to expose Phillips' lie is not difficult. Almost the entire Talmud presents such evidence. Anything good you will read in the Talmud is for Jews alone to practice among themselves.


Below are just a few examples (taken from the writings of Talmud scholar Michael Hoffman)

 By the way.........Is it possible? .........is it in any way possible that Phillips is unaware of the core content of her own religion. 

(Henry Makow says that most Jews know nothing about the Talmud. That most Jews never "go there"). 

Is it possible that she has been more-or-less raised as a Cultural Marxist and thinks that the suicidal (for the rest of us) nonsense she spouts is good for everybody?

I'd quite like to know.








Some Teachings of the Jewish Talmud

Where a Jew Should Do Evil
Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.
Penalty for Disobeying Rabbis
Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God
Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.
O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile ("Cuthean") the wages owed him for work.
Jews Have Superior Legal Status
Baba Kamma 37b. "If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full."
Jews May Steal from Non-Jews
Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile ("heathen") it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b). Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who "marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean..."
Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.
Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has "exposed their money to Israel."
Jews May Lie to Non-Jews
Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile.
Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human
Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.
Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.
Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.
Insults Against Blessed Mary
Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters." Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the "uncensored" text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, "Miriam the hairdresser," had sex with many men.
Gloats over Christ Dying Young
A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: "Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?--He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old."
Jesus in the Talmud:
Horrible Blasphemies Against Jesus Christ
While it is the standard disinformation practice of apologists for the Talmud to deny that it contains any scurrilous references to Jesus Christ, certain Orthodox Jewish organizations are more forthcoming and admit that the Talmud not only mentions Jesus but disparages him (as a sorcerer and a demented sex freak). These orthodox Jewish organizations make this admission perhaps out of the belief that Jewish supremacy is so well-established in the modern world that they need not concern themselves with adverse reactions.
For example, on the website of the Orthodox Jewish Hasidic Lubavitch group--one of the largest in the world--we find the following statement, complete with Talmudic citations:
"The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of 'Jesus the Nazarene':
1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).
2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).
3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh, which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b).
End quote from http://www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm (Lubavitch website) June 20, 2000.
[Note: we have printed and preserved in our files a hard copy of this statement from the Lubavitch"Noah's Covenant Website," as it appeared on their website at http://www.noahide.com on June 20, 2000, in the event that denials are later issued and the statement itself suppressed].
Let us examine further some of these anti-Christ Talmud passages:
Gittin 57a. Says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in "hot excrement."
Sanhedrin 43a. Says Jesus ("Yeshu" and in Soncino footnote #6, Yeshu "the Nazarene") was executed because he practiced sorcery: "It is taught that on the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry...He was an enticer and of such thou shalt not pity or condone."
Kallah 51a."The elders were once sitting in the gate when two young lads passed by; one covered his head and the other uncovered his head. Of him who uncovered his head Rabbi Eliezer remarked that he is a bastard. Rabbi Joshua remarked that he is the son of a niddah (a child conceived during a woman's menstrual period). Rabbi Akiba said that he is both a bastard and a son of a niddah.
"They said, 'What induced you to contradict the opinion of your colleagues?' He replied, "I will prove it concerning him." He went to the lad's mother and found her sitting in the market selling beans.
"He said to her, 'My daughter, if you will answer the question I will put to you, I will bring you to the world to come.' (eternal life). She said to him, 'Swear it to me.'
"Rabbi Akiba, taking the oath with his lips but annulling it in his heart, said to her, 'What is the status of your son?' She replied, 'When I entered the bridal chamber I was niddah (menstruating) and my husband kept away from me; but my best man had intercourse with me and this son was born to me.' Consequently the child was both a bastard and the son of a niddah.
"It was declared, '..Blessed be the God of Israel Who Revealed His Secret to Rabbi Akiba..."
In addition to the theme that God rewards clever liars, the preceding Talmud discussion is actually about Jesus Christ (the bastard boy who "uncovered his head" and was conceived in the filth of menstruation). The boy's adulterous mother in this Talmud story is the mother of Christ, Blessed Mary (called Miriam and sometimes, Miriam the hairdresser, in the Talmud).
"The Editio Princeps of the complete Code of Talmudic Law, Maimonides' Mishneh Torah -- replete not only with the most offensive precepts against all Gentiles but also with explicit attacks on Christianity and on Jesus (after whose name the author adds piously, 'May the name of the wicked perish')... --Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21.
"The Talmud contains a few explicit references to Jesus...These references are certainly not complimentary...There seems little doubt that the account of the execution of Jesus on the eve of Passover does refer to the Christian Jesus...The passage in which Jesus' punishment in hell is described also seems to refer to the Christian Jesus. It is a piece of anti-Christian polemic dating from the post-70 CE period..." --Hyam Maccoby, Judaism on Trial, pp. 26-27.
"According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned.
"The more popular accounts--which were nevertheless taken quite seriously--such as the notorious Toldot Yeshu are even worse, for in addition to the above crimes they accuse him of witchcraft. The very name 'Jesus' was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable and this popular tradition still persists...
"The Hebrew form of the name Jesus--Yeshu--was interpreted as an acronym for the curse, 'may his name and memory be wiped out,' which is used as an extreme form of abuse. In fact, anti-zionist Orthodox Jews (such as Neturey Qarta) sometimes refer to Herzl as 'Herzl Jesus' and I have found in religious zionist writings expressions such as "Nasser Jesus" and more recently 'Arafat Jesus." --Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 97- 98, 118.
Talmud Attacks Christians and Christian Books
Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.
Sanhedrin 90a. Those who read the New Testament ("uncanonical books") will have no portion in the world to come.
Shabbath 116a. Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament.
Dr. Israel Shahak of Hebrew University reports that the Israelis burned hundreds of New Testament Bibles in occupied Palestine on March 23, 1980 (cf. Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21).
Sick and Insane Teachings of the Talmud
Gittin 69a . To heal his flesh a Jew should take dust that lies within the shadow of an outdoor toilet, mix with honey and eat it.
Shabbath 41a. The law regulating the rule for how to urinate in a holy way is given.
Yebamoth 63a. States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden.
Yebamoth 63a. Declares that agriculture is the lowest of occupations.
Sanhedrin 55b. A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years "and a day" old).
Sanhedrin 54b. A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.
Kethuboth 11b. "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing."
Yebamoth 59b. A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a Jewish priest. A woman who has sex with a demon is also eligible to marry a Jewish priest.
Abodah Zarah 17a. States that there is not a whore in the world that the Talmudic sage Rabbi Eleazar has not had sex with. On one of his whorehouse romps, Rabbi Eleazar leanred that there was one particular prostitute residing in a whorehouse near the sea, who would receive a bag of money for her services. He took a bag of money and went to her, crossing seven rivers to do so. During their intercourse the prostitute farted. After this the whore told Rabbi Eleazar: "Just as this gas will never return to my anus, Rabbi Eleazar will never get to heaven."
Hagigah 27a. States that no rabbi can ever go to hell.
Baba Mezia 59b. A rabbi debates God and defeats Him. God admits the rabbi won the debate.
Gittin 70a. The Rabbis taught: "On coming from a privy (outdoor toilet) a man should not have sexual intercourse till he has waited long enough to walk half a mile, because the demon of the privy is with him for that time; if he does, his children will be epileptic."
Gittin 69b. To heal the disease of pleurisy ("catarrh") a Jew should "take the excrement of a white dog and knead it with balsam, but if he can possibly avoid it he should not eat the dog's excrement as it loosens the limbs."
Pesahim 111a. It is forbidden for dogs, women or palm trees to pass between two men, nor may others walk between dogs, women or palm trees. Special dangers are involved if the women are menstruating or sitting at a crossroads.
Menahoth 43b-44a. A Jewish man is obligated to say the following prayer every day: Thank you God for not making me a gentile, a woman or a slave.


etc, etc......

.

Sunday, 8 June 2014

FUNDING REQUIRED. PLEASE HELP.

Dear local MP,

Millions of British citizens are completely disconnected from the political process and have come to regard our own establishment as an enemy within.

The mass immigration that suppresses working-class incomes, the fact our young people often cannot afford to even rent a place to live, our subjugation to EU rule, the siphoning of wealth in the direction of the super-rich, the looting of public funds to save the banks that sunk our economy, the pursuance of continual war against people that offer no threat against us......

......from these realities, we the people are forced to conclude that whatever the political class is up to, it is not interested in serving our interests.

Government propaganda can only delay the British people's full realisation of the betrayals perpetrated against them.

I hope the Conservative and Labour parties (we make no such appeal to the Lib Dems, they being comprised mostly of  idiots incapable of realising the damage perceived betrayal will cause them) will consider the plight of our oppressed and sorely abused people and, (as you have so nobly done in Syria, Ukraine, Libya and elsewhere) please fund our opposition to the ongoing tyranny that causes our people so much distress?

Govenment power in the UK is based on a pantomime of democracy.

Its morality (like every aspect and every kind of Marxism) is insincere, designed to seduce gullible minds into accepting the creeping and ever-more pervasive tyranny that so obviously prevails.

The secret trials proposed over the past days is simply the next logical step in such processes (we can't have the government's participation in the terrorism [we pretend to abhor] exposed, can we?)

Account number and sort code to follow.

All my love,

KB

Saturday, 2 November 2013

FAIR QUESTIONS FOR ANY BRITISH M.P.

.


I visited my MP, Gavin Barwell (Con., Croydon Central), more than a year ago to raise the following questions. Having discussed various highly dubious and damaging-if-false assertions that are allowed to persist unchallenged in the public domain, I left him the document below with a request that he get back to me with whatever answers to the seven questions he could unearth. 

He said he would look into the issues but has (unsurprisingly) failed to respond. 

Nonetheless, it is surely a worthwhile exercise to make our representatives aware of the astonishing anomalies associate with the official 7/7 narrative.

Please read the following and continue to circulate these details, which conflict severely with the official narrative of the day. Please copy, print and post (or email) to your local M.P. and demand answers.

The 'London Bombings' and the lies we have been told about 7/7 must never be allowed to disappear from public consciousness. If the state believes it can safely lie to us about such matters, it will believe it can get away with absolutely anything.


SEVEN FAIR QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE 7/7 LONDON BOMBINGS  

Three Holes in the Floor of the Edgware Road Carriage

Evidence was given by different witnesses, including the train driver (Ray Whitehead), that clearly describe three large separate holes in front of two different sets of doors in the Edgware Road carriage. People fell into all three holes. Two emerged from the holes . One died in the third hole. The original report on the Edgware Road explosion (from mark Honigsbaum of the Guardian who was on the train) had the train lifting off the tracks and being derailed (i.e. bomb(s) underneath the train). The driver described all the access panels in the floor of the first coach (the bomb(s) killed people in the second carriage) being 'flipped open' from underneath.

References to evidence: Ray Whitehead (Nov 16 pm, 58:9-15) Daniel Belsden (Nov 11 am, 9:13-22) David Matthews (Nov 17, am, 105:21-106:18) John McDonald  (Nov 9, 42:18 – 44:11). Find all here at http://7julyinquests.independent.gov.uk/

QUESTION ONE
In what way is any of this compatible with a single suicide 'suicide bomber' carrying a rucksack full of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide?





Body Count reveals no Bombers

The First Official Body Count on Two of the Trains was One Body Short

At the 7/7/ Inquest in November 2010 Dr. Morgan Costello gave evidence that he was asked to attend two scenes, Edgware Road and Aldgate, for the 'purposes of certifying the extinction of life'. He counted six bodies at Edgware Road and seven bodies at Aldgate and declared these as 'life extinct'. The enormous anomaly, that passed completely unreported in the press, was that the numbers should have been seven and eight if we count the bodies of the bombers. No similar count seems to have been carried out on the other (Russell Square ) train but we do know a little about the behaviour of the Russell Square bomber, Germaine Lindsay, before his demise.

 QUESTION TWO
Are not these two body counts extraordinarily powerful evidence that there were no suicide bombers on the Aldgate and Edgware Road two trains?
Evidence presented to the Inquest did claim that Tanweer and Khan were blown into a large number different pieces by their bombs……but how would this be consistent with the fact that almost all the other serious injuries in those coaches were lower limb injuries to feet and legs?





The Explosives

Here is a timeline for the 7/7 explosives narrative as it developed:

The first analysis came from a genuine expert. This is surely the most reliable commentary on the nature of the bombs that went off that morning. The problem is that it would have been all-but-impossible for four young men from Leeds to get their hands on such materials.

On 12 July 2005, Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, chief of French anti-terrorism Coordination Unit who was in London assisting Scotland Yard with its investigation, confirmed to The Times that,‘The nature of the explosives appears to be military, which is very worrying….the material used were not homemade but sophisticated military explosives …’ (Nafeez Ahmed The London Bombs, p.24)

On 13th July it was stated that these were of ‘C4’ explosive....London explosives have military origin – [Science Daily. LONDON, July 13 (UPI)]: Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced, and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet.’

From The Independent on July 14th: ‘A bath filled with explosives has been found at a house in Leeds that was the “operational base” for the London suicide bombers
17th July 2005 The Observer: ‘22 lbs TATP in the bath.’

The TATP story survived but faded away in 2007 then, when the 7/7 Kingston trial came along in the summer of 2008 all trace of the TATP story had gone.

Now the explosives were made of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide. The idea of the four heating up Hydrogen Peroxide in their kitchen to the point where it would make an explosive mix with black pepper is simply laughable. How could they test that their ‘bombs’ were going to go off. Were they going to go lurching across the country with this kind of bomb sloshing about in their rucksacks. Has anybody ever made a bomb out of this mixture? If such a bomb did explode could it possibly have caused the devastation created on 7/7?

There is much written online that mocks these materials as potential tools of mass destruction. Do we not require a Public Inquiry on this issue alone. The changing storyline above surely makes no sense at all.

QUESTION THREE (Bombs)
How would four inexperienced Muslims have known how to reduce the hydrogen peroxide to the right concentrations safely?
Why was no chemical analysis of the blast burns inside the carriages carried out? 





….more seriously

Why No Post-Mortems?

Another astonishing fact that emerged during the 2010-11 7/7 Inquest was that no post mortems were carried out on the bodies of the victims. A very great deal about the nature of and distance from the explosions could have been discovered from such examinations. The effects of different explosives on flesh are well-known. Such post-mortems would have provided some definitive information that would have at least ruled out some possible explosives from consideration as the source material of the blasts. What could possibly explain such an oversight other than the desire to avoid creating conflicts with a fabricated narrative.

QUESTION FOUR (Bombs)
 Why were there no post-mortems on any of the victims? (definitive information about the explosives could have been gained from such investigations)




Why Suicide?

Moving on to another very obvious (but irresolvable) question: why would terrorists who wished to wreak havoc and punish British people for the UK’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan choose to blow themselves up along with their victims? These were very crowded trains. They could have set a timed detonator and quietly slipped off the trains a stop or two early, leaving their bags on the floor amongst the feet of dozens of incurious passengers. Where would have been the risk in that? Surely such activists would better serve their cause by continuing and not terminating their mission?




Another obvious question:
QUESTION FIVE(CCTV)

Why, in the most CCTV-rich environment on earth, is there so little footage of the four available? Why is it that the few pictures that are available mostly contain no other identifiable persons that could confirm the accuracy and veracity of these pictures? Surely it should have been possible to construct a water-tight case against the four from the CCTV alone?




Drills


There were four uncannily accurate drills (or rehearsals) carried out before the 7/7 bombings:
1) The BBC Panorama ‘management exercise’ programme of May 2004 during which a panel of ‘managers’, including Peter Power (see below) and Michael Portillo, discussed how they would deal with a terror attack on London that revealed itself to them through mock news reports as the show progressed. The scenario they had to deal with turned out to be one overground and 3 underground explosions taking place over a short space of time during the morning rush hour.

2) The contemporaneous 7/7 drill: on 7/7 itself Peter Power conducted a terror drill that shadowed the cataclysm as it happened – over the same three tube stations at more or less the same time. On the afternoon of 7/7 he was interviewed on Radio 5’s ‘Drivetime’ programme:
POWER: …at half-past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for, er, over, a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!

3) Atlantic Blue: held over 5-8 April, 2005. All echelons of government participated in this large terror-drill. The Independent reported after July 7th that “By an extraordinary coincidence, all the experts who formulate such plans are together in a meeting at the headquarters of the London Ambulance Service – and they are discussing an exercise they ran three months ago that involved simulating four terrorist bombs going off at once across London.”

4) Operation Hanover: London’s police hold a little-known yearly terror-drill. On 2005 it just happened to be held on 1-2 July. Its game-plan was threefold: three ‘simultaneous’ bomb attacks on three underground stations. The police have been reticent about discussing this astounding precursor event, mere days before 7/7. They only revealed it in 2009.

QUESTION SIX
What is the probability that practice drills should be going on in exactly the same stations at exactly the same time as surprise terrorist attacks occur?





Germaine Lindsay, cool and then confused


Germaine Lindsay drove from Aylesbury to meet the other (let’s call them) bombers in Luton railway station. He arrived an hour before them and decided to take a little nap. He received a parking ticket while asleep in his car. Were he a terrorist he obviously would have known that he would have had only four hours left to live.

Germaine Lindsay was one extraordinarily relaxed suicide-bomber.

A station attendant called Mr. Patel gave testimony to the Inquest that a man he identified as Germaine Lindsay arrived on the concourse of King’s Cross station and asked to talk to “The Duty Manager”. He said it was, “Very important.” Mr Patel remarked that it was very unusual for a member of the public to know the exact name for the person in charge of the station. Normally people asked for ‘the supervisor’ or ‘the manager’. At this time there was chaos on the concourse. The metal grills had been pulled down and shut at the front of the station. Passengers were not being allowed through the barriers. A crowd had built up and people were starting to abuse staff. Numbers of ‘Community Support Officers’ who looked like police were milling around the area trying to manage the situation. No wonder Lindsay was confused. He must have decided to try to speak to someone who ‘was in on the game’ to explain to him what was going on. The most obvious explanation of his behaviour is that it would have puzzled and alarmed him that the drill had started before he, ‘the bomber’, had caught their trains. Perhaps a chilling possibility occurred to him. When Mr. Patel returned with the duty manager Lindsay had gone.

And More

There are many, many other serious anomalies and matters requiring investigation in the official narrative.


1. Train Times
The train times presented huge problems for the official narrative causing the Home Secretary to change the story after it was realised that the 7.40 they were said to have caught had been cancelled. Then the next train arrived 23 minutes late at King’s Cross giving the bombers only three minutes to buy four RETURN tickets (think about that one), cross the track by bridge and board the last possible train that makes it just feasible they could have reached the bombed trains in time.

2. Khan
On the 5th July 2005, Mohammed Siddique Khan took his pregnant wife to Dewsbury Hospital in West Yorkshire. She was bleeding and there was obviously something wrong. Doctors examined Hasina Patel and said that there was a ‘threatened miscarriage’. They sent her home and booked her in for a scan on the 7th. Mrs Patel has never told the time they got home but afterwards Mohammed Khan said that he was ‘going to see his friends’. Hasina Patel never saw or heard from her husband ever again. She miscarried on July 6th . At the 7/7 Inquest there was ‘evidence’ (peculiar and surely untrustworthy) presented of a mobile phone text-message exchange between Khan and Germaine Lindsay at 4.35am on the morning of the 6th July. Would Khan really have abandoned his desperate wife for a whole day while she was in that condition? Khan was a highly respected in his community and by the headmistress of the special school in which he worked as a classroom assistant. The police had used him to mediate between rival gangs in local disputes. He was trusted by all sides. Hilary Benn had taken Khan on a tour of the House of Commons. He was not known to be politically radical. Quite the opposite. He was protective of the good name of his community and was eager to maintain good relations with the local white community. Bearing this in mind it is likely that the reason the police have film of Khan is that he was helping them ‘keep an eye on’ any worrisome Muslim elements in his locality. He was not a troublemaker, he was a healer and a fixer.
The most likely explanation for Khan’s disappearance on the 6th is that he told his minder for the 7/7 exercise that he was not going to be able to make it. . He would have been told to see that the others could make it without him. The bombings were not going to be called off but……now he had presented his minders with a problem that had only one possible solution. His goose was cooked.

This would also explain why the attendant at the filling station where Tanweer filled his car (and argued about the change he was given) said he only saw one other person in Tanweer’s car. Hasib Hussain alone (the bus-bomber) was in the car and, unknown to the pair of them, Khan was by now already dead. This would also explain why the now-suppressed BBC radio 5 news reports from the late morning of the seventh said that two men had been shot in Canary Wharf (rather than three, the supposed train bombers. Hussain had been separated from the others).

Those who have travelled to Beeston and spoken to locals report that, like Khan, Hussain and Tanweer had shown no inclination in their communities towards political or religious radicalism.

The Evidence against ‘The Four’

Looking at the detail of latest narrative laid out before the 7/7 Inquest, it must be admitted that it is now just physically possible that the four caught the last possible train at Luton and rushed from King’s Cross Thameslink to the various subway platforms before detonating their deadly cargos. However, their relaxed demeanour in the very few still photos presented as evidence militates against the probability that they were rushing about madly that morning (especially with all that liquid explosive slopping about on their backs).

Why too in the most CCTV-rich environment on earth are there only a couple of very poor pictures of the four, one at Luton, one at Thameslink, the date and time stamps on which could have easily been photoshopped. Could the photos of Khan have been used from the ‘practice run’ the four carried out on 29th June 2005, just eight days earlier?

The mobile phone evidence places them all on the correct train at the right time. Three things about this though. Firstly, this is new evidence that was not released in the previous 2006 hearing. Why? Second, is it likely that these men would have been texting each other on train they had all boarded together. Finally, this is the kind of evidence easily faked. It is letters and numbers on a piece of paper.

Khan and Tanweer could easily have been talked into making the Jihadi videos that have played such a large part in aiding the public to accept their guilt. They were employees, well-paid for two days work, the practice on June 29th and for the day itself. They were told that the exercise has to be made as realistic as possible. The film would be in the hands of the station staff and other authorities giving them a possible means of intercepting the four. The on-camera ‘threats’ from Khan and Tanweer are vague and unspecific. When Hasina Patel first saw these videos it was reported that she said, “That’s not my husband.” Her brother thought it was Khan. It is most likely that she meant, “ I know him. He would never say such things.”
The ‘bombers’ all had four or more mobile phones each; one of their own private phones and at least three other (so-called) ‘operational’ phones that they are supposed to have used to confound anyone who might attempt to track their communications and obstruct their diabolical plan. It is most likely that these phones were supplied by their minder and that their holding them allowed their ‘handlers’ to track Tanweer and Lindsay down in Canary Wharf after they had panicked and gone on the run, presumably (and naively) hoping to tell their story to the British press who are mostly based there.

Government sources might deny it but there are 2 competing narratives that describe what happened on 7/7/05

1) The official story of four suicide bombers murdering 52 people and injuring hundreds by exploding four bombs on three tube trains and one bus on the morning of 7/7.

2) Forces embedded within the establishment carried out a false-flag attack against the British people. As with nearly all false-flag events, patsies were set up to take the blame for the crime. The four Muslims were completely innocent actors paid to participate in a concurrent anti-terror 'drill'.


In a court of law physical evidence always trumps excuses, allegations, observations or any other kind of verbal contribution to a case…..

……so….

QUESTION SEVEN

Which of the above narratives more closely matches the facts of the case?


.